# Note : A correction to this post dated 12th May has been posted and additional comment added on 15th May.
The so called warnings to hedge funds:
This morning I read a headline Bernanke warns Hedge Fund Billionaires on the Fox News website. According to the writer ‘in an unusual warning, the central bank waved a red flag about the growing risks in the $1.4 trillion hedge fund industry. …………the ink was barely dry on the Fed’s hedge fund warning when UBS, the biggest money manager in the world, announced that it was forced to shutter its hedge fund at a cost of more than $300 million, due to staggering losses in the sub-prime mortgage market.’
The so called warning was in remarks made yesterday at a conference on hedge funds and risk organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and reported on by the Chicago Sun-Times . Referring to the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management, the hedge fund that received a $3.6 billion private bailout in 1998, Bernanke said ’Authorities should and will try to ensure that the lapses in risk management of 1998 do not happen again’
Last month in a speech at the New York University Law School Financial Regulation and the Invisible Hand.Bernanke addressed hedge fund regulation at some length. Here are a few points from the speech: ‘The growing market share of hedge funds has raised concerns about possible systemic risk…… the collapse of a hedge fund might come with little warning….many hedge funds are either highly leveraged or hold positions in derivatives or other assets that make their net asset positions very sensitive to changes in asset prices…..leverage also increases the risks to the broader financial system….. The failure of a highly leveraged fund ….could involve ….. heavy losses on counterparties.(that) could lead to further defaults or threaten systemically important institutions. …… market discipline can fail, as is illustrated by the hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management (LTCM), which was at the center of an episode of severe financial stress in 1998′ Its probably my fault but, after reading and re-reading Bernanke’s speech, am not sure what he is saying.
Please, Dr Bernanke, no Greenspeak
Please, Dr Bernanke, don’t start using your predecessor Alan Greenspan’s Greenspeak language. He was opaque, long winded and he used to quip ‘if you think you know what I meant you didn’t understand what I was saying.’ Markets and investors need you to say what you mean and mean what you say. Let’s cut to the chase. Is Warren Buffet right that leverage and excessive use of derivatives have made your efforts to regulate credit irrelevant?
As a blogger on gold I am of course also being too long winded. The message is simple. When you read about a super danger from the world’s most respected investor and risks of systemic failure from the world’s most important central banker it’s time to think about the best protection for even unlikely worst case scenarios. Gold.
Correction : 12th May 2007:
Dr. Bernanke’s speech on Financial Regulation that I found long winded and had difficulty getting to grips with was not comment addressed to the investing community. It was addressed to students at the New York Uniersity Law School. In this context my critical remarks were inappropriate. Further US Treasury Secretary Paulson is chairing a White House working group addressing hedge fund issues, systemic risk and investor protection. Bernanke is a member of that group.
Bernanke is also the keynote speaker (viia satelite) at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta’s conference:‘Credit Derivatives : Where’s the risk?’ on Tuesday May 15th. There is no reference on the Bank’s website of preliminary comments from him. From the agenda it does not appear that the question whether hedge funds and the use of leverage and derivatives have impaired the Federal Reserve’s power to control credit is up for discussion..
15th May :
Dr. Bernanke’s speech Regulation and Financial Innovation focused on managing risk with credit derivatives. . There was no comment on monetary policy, economics or the issue raised by Warren Buffet that excessive use of derivatives had made central banker’s efforts to control consumer credit irrelevant..